College Sports

  • Gene Therapy: Where Are All the Brother's At?

    The Issue!

     

    When the rumors began to trickle out that Marcus Freeman would be the next head football coach at Notre Dame, I was happy for him and even more happy for us. “Hey, we’ve got one!” That’s what I told a colleague jokingly; but as I began to raise my hands in triumph, I realized that this in itself was the problem. After all, why should a black man being hired to coach a team in a sport dominated by black men elicit such joy? Even at Notre Dame, a university where the team tends to be filled with more white players than people of color, it is almost an even split. It’s a surprise because when you get past the newly hired Freeman, and a couple other names around the landscape, it becomes extremely difficult to drum up names of coaches who look like the majority of the players on the teams. 

     

    More disturbing is that we hear about all of these up and coming coordinators, these fast risers, the coaches who are destined to be head coaches and none of them seem to be black. We see people get head coaching jobs who seem to have come out of nowhere and yet, still no jobs for black coaches. Even the lower level coach who is killing it or in some cases just doing a decent job. The white coaches seem to find that upward mobility much faster than black coaches or even worse, the black coach never gets the opportunity to reach that level. As a black coach, it is disappointing to not see men who look like me given the same opportunities to lead programs. So the Freeman hire gets reduced to throwing us a bone. It will be applauded and spoken about as if this is a point in history when everything changed but this yearly game of coaching musical chairs will undoubtedly end as it usually does every season. Most of the black coaches will be left standing and looking with no seat to sit in while they look at other coaches who never have to worry about finding a seat. 

     

    The Effect!

     

    The lack of minority leaders in this game has a deleterious effect on the young men who play the game. We have been programmed to believe that it is the league or bust and that making it to the league is achieved only through playing. Many black players don’t think about coaching or other jobs in sports until they have exhausted every other avenue to play the game. Why is that? When most black kids start playing the game, the youth league is full of strong black coaches with magnetic personalities who are looking to give back and set an example. But, as those young black kids progress they see less and less black men in charge. The high school level has a ton of black coaches but far less black head coaches and hardly any at the well-respected or well-funded schools. When they get to college, outside of the HBCU’s you will be hard pressed to find a wealth of black head coaches at any level. So who do they have to look up to in the profession; who do they gleam their example from? For most of my life I never believed a black man could be president but when I was in my mid-20’s I saw it happen. Over those eight years the amount of young black people who became more involved or interested in politics was astronomical. You can point to the interest and involvement in Golf once Tiger Woods came on the scene. Black men in football need to see black leaders in order to understand with certainty that they too can lead a football team. 

     

    The Solution!

     

    As always, complaining about a problem without a solution is useless. What makes this problem difficult is that there does not seem to be an easy solution in place. It is not as easy as just saying “hire more black head coaches.” I really wish it was but the problem is not a lack of qualified candidates like many would have you believe. We routinely see qualified black coaches in the NFL passed over for lesser experienced white coaches who have been deemed geniuses. We have seen the goal post move from defense to offense to special teams when it has suited those making the choices. The problem is value. The decision makers don’t see the value in hiring a black coach because they are getting the commodity without the black coach. But what would happen if the commodity dried up except in places where there were black coaches? Would that not streamline the process of more programs grabbing black coaches to lead their team? If at the end of the day: great players equal wins, wins equal eyeballs, and eyeballs equal dollars; then the solution is simple. Unfortunately the execution is hard. 

     

    As with most movements for equality, the youth must lead the way. The highly touted prospects need to shun schools being led by coaches who don’t look like him. Imagine if Notre Dame landed the top recruiting class four years in a row based solely off of who the coach was at the school. Copycat syndrome would ensue and other universities would follow suit. Imagine if the HBCU’s, who are already among the largest attendance-drawing FCS programs in the country, began to get four and five star talent regularly and directly out of high school. The landscape of the FCS would change so fast that the entire SWAC and MEAC might decide to go to the FBS that would then mean more scholarships and more of the best and brightest taking their talents to places like FAMU and North Carolina A&T. We have seen the impact that Coach Prime and his staff have made in less than a year at Jackson State. It would not take long. But it would mean that some of these young men would need to prioritize the cause, over 100 million dollar facilities. The allure of places like Georgia is not the history because as black people we understand there was a time when we were not welcome there. The allure is the amenities and the perceived fast track to the NFL. The truth is that the NFL doesn't care where you play, they care that you can play. So they will go where the talent is. As for the amenities, they follow the money and the money follows the talent. 

     

    Years ago, when one athletics program integrated, it was not long before the other programs followed suit. Why? Because the teams with black players were better. In the end it has always been about talent. The talent on the field will always trump the talent on the sidelines because in honesty at the collegiate level there is not a chasm between the winning coaches and the losing one's abilities, there’s usually a gap in talent. How long do you think it would take for these programs to start hiring black head coaches, if it meant keeping the talent coming?

     

    ###

     

    Gene Clemons is a Sports Analyst and Contributor to CWN Sports. His weekly column and podcast - Gene Therapy focuses on Sports, Politics and Social/Urban issues.

     

    Read more
  • Big Ten, ACC, and Pac-12 Alliance Expected to be Announced

    Source: Big Ten, ACC, Pac-12 alliance to combat SEC's influence expected to be announced Tuesday (link)

     

    The Big Ten, ACC and Pac-12 are expected to formally announce their long-awaited alliance on Tuesday afternoon, sources close to the situation tell CBS Sports. The agreement between the three conferences will focus on NCAA governance and college football scheduling, but the leagues also plan to get on the same page regarding future College Football Playoff expansion.

    Realignment among the three conferences has not been part of their discussions and will not be an issue addressed with the alliance. However, a significant portion of alliance conversations have been based on ensuring that athletes' academic success remains integral to the college sports experience.

    The Big Ten, ACC and Pac-12 have actively been engaged in discussions about forming a scheduling alliance for at least two weeks. The Athletic's Nicole Auerbach first reported that an announcement would come Tuesday. 

    The alliance became a priority for the three Power Five conferences after Texas and Oklahoma moved to the SEC from the Big 12. Talks between the Big Ten, ACC and Pac-12 have been described, according to CBS Sports, as a "non-aggression pact" against the SEC after the Big 12 was destabilized following the losses of the Longhorns and Sooners. That power grab tipped the scales toward the SEC in future college athletics dealings. Meanwhile, Big 12 revenues is expected to decline by at least 50% with the losses of Texas and Oklahoma.

    Even with the alliance, the SEC will likely maintain its advantage as the conference with the most best teams.

    Read more
  • JR Smith Goes Back to College - and Wants to Play Golf?

    Source: Two-time NBA champion JR Smith heads to college with eyes set on playing golf (link)

     

    JR Smith may be 35 years old, but that doesn't mean his athletic dreams are extinguished.

    Smith, a 16-year NBA veteran, has enrolled at North Carolina A&T State University with the intention of joining the university's golf team. He is primarily pursuing a degree in liberal studies -- his classes start on August 18 -- but he is waiting for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) to work out his eligibility before he applies for the team of one of the nation's top historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs).

    Smith skipped going to college and went straight from high school to the NBA in 2004 but said he began thinking about going to college during a trip to the Dominican Republic with Hall of Famer Ray Allen. Additionally, Smith can often be seen among the gallery at PGA Tour events -- and he says he plays to a five handicap.

    He has petitioned the NCAA to be eligible to play but it is not clear on how long that process will take. According to NCAA rules: "An individual shall not be eligible for intercollegiate athletics in a sport if the individual ever competed on a professional team in that sport."

    It does not ban a former professional athlete from competing in a different sport.

    Read more
  • Johnny Juzang Withdraws from NBA Draft

    Source: Breakout NCAA tournament star Johnny Juzang pulls out of NBA draft in favor of returning to UCLA Bruins (link)

     

    UCLA guard Johnny Juzang made a name for himself as the breakout star of the NCAA tournament as the Bruins advanced all the way to the Final Four. Some fans and media (me included) recognized him a potential sleeper in the 2021 draft due to his performance. But Wednesday, Juzang announced he was withdrawing from the NBA draft and returning to the Bruins.

    Juzang helped lead UCLA on a Cinderella run in the NCAA tournament in March, winning five games to go from First Four to Final Four. He had 23 points in the opening win over Michigan State, followed by 27 points against BYU. He was at his best in the final two games, a win over Michigan and a loss to Gonzaga. Juzang went for 28 points in the victory over the Wolverines, and his 29 points nearly led UCLA to an upset of the top-seeded Bulldogs in the Final Four.

    In the Bruins' six NCAA tournament games, Juzang averaged 22.8 points and shot 50.9% from the field. His 137 points were the second-highest NCAA tournament total in UCLA history. On the season, the 6-foot-6 shooting guard averaged 16.0 points and 4.1 rebounds.

    Despite the breakout postseason, Juzang was only projected as a late second-round pick in the NBA draft. He was ranked No. 53 in ESPN's latest draft rankings.

    Juzang's return likely cements UCLA as a preseason top-five team for the 2021-22 campaign. Cronin returns every player from the Bruins' NCAA tournament run, while also adding five-star prospect Peyton Watson, ESPN 100 guard Will McClendon and Rutgers graduate transfer Myles Johnson. Chris Smith, who missed the second half of the season, opted to leave for the NBA draft, while Cody Riley announced Wednesday he planned to return to UCLA.

    Read more
  • NCAA Allows Athletes Profit off of their Likeness

     

     The NCAA an institution that has been built on the backs of amateur athletes and under the premise that these athletes participate in these lucrative events in exchange for free education has changed their whole point of view. The NCAA on Wednesday June 30th agreed to allow college athletes to make money of their Name, Image and Likeness as of July 1 2021. In layman’s terms these athletes are now able to ink endorsement deals, sell autographs and even profit off YouTube and other social media outlets. 

     

      Why the sudden change of heart, has the mighty NCAA and board of directors finally seen the error of their ways. Is this a moment of repentance or just way to stay ahead of the negative publicity that will loom within the legacy of the NCAA.  This decision was actually prompted by the not only pressure growing increasingly unbearable from political point of views but legal stand point was in question as well.  States from Alabama to Oregon were hours away from implementing laws that would challenge the NCAA’s old amateur rules when the board of directors rescinded the rule (even in states that were not in danger of these new laws).  To be clear the original rule stated players were not allowed “to advertise, recommend or promote directly the sale or use of a commercial property or service of any kind”.  Just the thought of rescinding the before mentioned rule should blow your mind when you calculate the possible millions that awaits these children.

     

      Though I am happy to see that these kids who have worked so hard are now have an opportunity to earn fraction of what the schools are earning off them. It would be quite an ignominious display to celebrate these steps forward without questioning how will NCAA rectify it’s past. Will Reggie Bush get his Heisman back? Will the Fab 5’s legacy be vindicated? Hell , will Myles Bridges get his $40 back? Only time will tell. Many people from the barber shops to the boardrooms differ on the opinion of what should happen but what’s not questionable is the immediate effect it will have on recruiting. 

     

     Now schools with very high powered Alumni will be feared due to possible added endorsements for the schools recruits pick. I wonder will this change how AAU will be viewed? Will top tier EYBL games be filled with more commercial entities than college coaches? Most importantly with the ongoing issue of wage disparities between male and female sports how will this translates to this new terrain of the NCAA  and possible endorsers? Like I said before I am happy for these kids and  excited they will be paid. It seems the rule change has led to more questions than answers . This rule change and how things are moving forward will be legacy over the NCAA. Those that sacrificed their college career to pursue the life their hard work has afforded them you are the martyrs. This is your win too, and the NCAA can never take that away,…..again.

     

    Read more

Latest Articles

Most Popular