CWNNewsFeed

• Gene Therapy - NFL Draft 2022 Thoughts | Everybody's a GM

  May 3, 2022 Gene Clemons 0 Comments

  

   

  by Gene Clemons

   

  The 2022 NFL Draft is officially in the books and, as always, it was great to watch so many young men realize their dream. They got to hear their name called and see their faces flash in front of the shield and a team logo. Then they quickly introduced to their new reality, scrutiny at every turn. Draft pundits either rifling through papers or scrolling through iPads to check their evaluations on the paper and make snap judgements on whether that young man was a good or bad selection. The players learn that fans are only fans if they believe in what you can do for their team, not because they believe in you. They get poked, prodded, and evaluated for what they did in games, only to have those performances usurped by what they do in t-shirts and shorts, then have the things they accomplished in both pushed aside because of where they played, the position the played, or the unrealized potential of another. The draft is wild, and we are here for it all. But why? Well, the answer is fairly simple, we all believe we could be the general manager of our favorite teams.

   

  The truth is that there are so many variables that go into doing the job of a GM that drafting talent is probably not the top priority. Between managing the players that are on the team and dealing with their personal expectations, trying to fulfill the needs of the coaching staff and what they feel is necessary to put a winning product on the field the job is difficult enough. That is before you have to deal with the owner and their agenda, which could be completely different than that of the players and the coaching staff. Mix that with your own professional desires and philosophies that you believe in and the gumbo that most general managers have to mix is almost impossible for everyone to find tasty. Despite all of that, the most public job of the general manager is the draft. Even more than free agency, the draft is where GMs are asked to explain the vision without giving up any legitimate details about the plan. They have to address the issues that the fan base feels exist while also stating a purpose that they cannot fully reveal. Most people would crumble underneath so much pressure and scrutiny and still it does not stop the average fan from believing they could do a better job. We have to blame someone for these reckless assumptions, but who?

   

  Start with Mel Kiper Jr. The oldest and most recognizable draft analyst in the game, created this space that so many others live in. He birthed a nation of draft followers and future draft analysts and writers because he is the “every man.” A guy who does not come from a legit football background who was able to turn his obsession with player evaluations and rankings into a lucrative sports career. Well, we all know that imitation is the greatest form of flattery, and with the explosion of digital media, and the easy access it provided, everybody, it was simple for others to follow Kiper's footsteps. The results are what we see today. Countless amounts of sites dedicated to the draft. Hundreds of draft guides produced and distributed, and millions of dollars pumped into draft content in order to make billions. By the way, many of us should thank Mel Kiper for his contribution to the culture. He was the north star.

   

  You can also blame these NFL front offices. If you are given millions of dollars and a team of 50 to scout, analyze, and draft players, your hit percentage has to be higher than 50-60% or the average Joe at home watching the team every Sunday is going to believe they can do your job. After all, how can you get it wrong when you have had at least three seasons to build a file on these prospects? Why would you need a combine for anything other than medical evaluations? Why would you ever reach for unproven talent? Why would you need to project out talent when there are so many proven commodities? 

   

  Many times, people don’t understand that this is an inexact science, but it is a science. There are markers that usually point to success. Sometimes the players that a fan or a recruiting publication likes, is not even placed on the board for an NFL team. Those reasons can be as simple as a player’s medical history or as complicated as a size/athleticism ratio that the scouting department came up with those points to previous NFL success. We don’t account for the fact that sometimes the players we believe are good, an NFL team sees them as average players at best. Sometimes both sides believe a player is a quality football player, but the team does not see the player as an immediate need on the team and devalues them in the draft. Whatever the reason, these inconsistencies and unknown variables further open up the possibility for question by those who patronize a team and the NFL at large.

   

  And once the draft is over, before a player has a chance to prove a GM right or wrong, fans and media outlets are already on to the next year. The draft and all of its tentacles have for better or worse become its own competition. Every year we award grades to the winners and losers of the draft. We give them imaginary accolades and before they have the chance to bask in their success, there is always a mock draft released pinpointing another need for the team next season. Someone equated giving a draft a grade is the equivalent of grading someone on a test before they ever take it. As ridiculous as it sounds when explained so simply, words could never be truer. That is a part of the intrigue, that is the reason why so many people feel they can do the job. Not only does it not take skill to guess, but what is the backlash when they get their choices wrong. fans never have to assume any of the responsibility when they choose a player that is a bust. 

   

  ###

   

   

  Gene Clemons is a Sports Analyst and Contributor to CWN Sports. His weekly column and podcast - Gene Therapy focuses on Sports, Politics and Social/Urban issues.

   

  Read more

• Gene Therapy: What Should A Coach Do?

  Apr 15, 2022 Gene Clemons 0 Comments

  

   

  by Gene Clemons

   

  When I first read the headline that the head volleyball coach at Grambling dismissed the entire volleyball team, I thought it was a joke or that there was something more to the story that I was missing. Upon further investigation, it was discovered that the new coach did in fact cut every young lady off her team. My first reaction was, "Damn! That’s cold-blooded!” The other people I talk to regularly all felt that this coach was wrong for what she was doing. I began to feel a weird duality at the time. As a player and a human being, I felt like this was the wrong thing to do but as a coach, I could understand the move. Ultimately, I don’t believe that I would have the ability to do that to players, but I can’t pretend that I don’t understand. So in an effort to explore this from the other side I wanted to explain why this may not be the last time you see a drastic move like this made.

   

  I know how coaches who take over bad jobs get treated when they don’t win. They are treated as if they are failures, like it is their fault the team has not won. If it is their first opportunity as a head coach, they may never get another job. Every time they interview for a job, they must explain why they were not successful in their first stint. Most of the time we all know the real reason but we just don’t want to admit it. The players were not good enough and the coach was not given enough time to recruit better, implement or change a culture, and get the team going in a winning direction. But if a coach goes into an interview and blames a lack of talent, then it is received as if he is shifting the blame off himself. So coaches are almost forced to admit to shortcomings that they don’t really believe they possess in order to show that they have grown from their first opportunity. 

   

  Meanwhile the players rarely receive the scrutiny associated with losing. There is usually some accountability piece they are missing. So many players get to college and feel like the job is over. They have reached their goal and now is the time to reap the rewards of their hard work throughout the prep ranks. So they go to college and never improve beyond what they were in high school. Some believe they are being disrespected when they are not playing and they transfer but others don’t really care about playing as long as they are getting that scholarship money. That has a negative effect on the players who do play. They don’t feel the pressure coming from the players behind them and therefore don’t rise to the level they need to be in order to elevate the team. Rinse, wash, repeat and you end up in a situation that a lot of the non-revenue generating sports find themselves in, especially at HBCU’s. 

   

  Chelsey Lucas seems to know HBCU women’s volleyball very well. Before being named the head coach at Grambling, she was the head coach at Arkansas Pine Bluff for three seasons and before that she spent three seasons at Alcorn State. At both stops her overall record was under .500 and she had to make due with small victories. She improved both of the programs she took over and now she gets a chance to return to her Alma Mater which makes this story take an ever more interesting turn. Who knows the culture of Grambling volleyball better than a woman who had personal success representing the university on the court. She was a first team All-SWAC performer and defensive player of the year in 2006 for the Tigers. I am sure she could attest to the skill level and accountability inside the locker room. As someone from the outside looking in, if a coach felt this was what she needed to do in order for the team to have success, her experience would say that if anyone had an understanding of what to do it would be her. 

   

  Let’s not pretend as if this has not been done in some capacity before. Over the years coaches have found creative ways to separate players from a program. They have done everything from lowering scholarships to the bare minimum, to creating expectations that are impossible to meet. Every time you see a player enter the transfer portal you can't possibly believe it is because they want to, sometimes they feel they have no other choice. The writings on the wall. When Taulia Tagovailoa watched his brother Tua rise to superstar status at Alabama so he naturally thought he would follow in his big brother's footsteps. He quickly learned that it would not be the case and he transferred to Maryland. That may have been the best thing for him. It humbled him and probably made him work even harder to prove the people at Bama wrong or to live up to his own expectations. What Lucas did was cut out the histrionics that come with these moves or at least she thought she did. 

   

  Looking at this from a coach's perspective I bet she felt she was doing the best thing for the school, for those players, and definitely for herself. For the school, it's an opportunity to build a winning culture and a team that alumni and donors want to invest in. For the players it is a chance to possibly find a school better built for their skills or maybe it is the motivation necessary to raise their abilities and expectations. For her, it is a chance to create a legacy at the place she called home. An opportunity to help thousands of young ladies reach their full potential as players and as women why winning at a high level.

   

  The one thing that we are not sure of but would absolutely be a necessity in this case is what is she doing to help those displaced young ladies find another home. We don't know how much scholarship money these ladies were on. We know it is volleyball and it is at an HBCU so it would not be irresponsible to say they probably don't have the same amounts of equivalencies as Penn State. Currently there is push back and outrage over the coach's decision and campaigns are in place to try and reinstate the players but ultimately who does that truly serve. If it is about playing the game the relationship is probably forever fractured.  The only hope is that Lucas is helping those players find other homes to finish their careers and more importantly their degrees because that is still the main goal.

   

  I'm sure all of the discourse and media attention surrounding this decision doesn't make the job easier. The old saying, "You have to crack some eggs to make an omelet" never tells you what happens when the shells get in the food. However, this episode plays out, if it doesn't end with winning Lucas will undoubtedly pay a steep price. If they win, it will cover up the stench of this decision and the fallout from it. She could go on to have a fruitful career and so many more women than she hurt with this decision but that is a big if. The team is 81-207 since 2011. That is a lot to turn around and as of now, the clock is ticking. I wish those young ladies nothing but the best, and I hope Lucas wins.

   

  ###

    

   

  Gene Clemons is a Sports Analyst and Contributor to CWN Sports. His weekly column and podcast - Gene Therapy focuses on Sports, Politics and Social/Urban issues.

  Read more

• Mambacita First, Mamba Forever.

  Apr 3, 2022 Andrew Williams 0 Comments

  

   

  by Andrew Williams

   

  It was almost a year ago when the news that rattled the sneaker world and the NBA community hit the newsfeeds and timelines. Nike announced that all Kobe- related footwear and apparel will cease production. At this time the deal that Kobe locked in after his retirement in 2016 was coming to an end, and with the recent passing (at the time) of the late great player it seemed like we would never see another Nike Kobe shoe. It felt like we would have to look Devin Booker or Demar Derozan to open an eBay store before we see another Kobe shoe.  We can’t say we were aware of the reasons the deal fell through, but the Bryant camp was looking for the rare lifetime Nike deal which is currently only held by only by athletes like Michael Jordan, LeBron James, and Cristiano Ronaldo solely.  So this was going to be a tough sell for the Bryant camp and at that time the deal stalled out. 

   

     Oh happy day sneaker-heads on March 24 2022, Nike officially announced they will be partnering with Vanessa Bryant and the Bryant family on championing a new generation of fans focusing on youth sports.  So what that means is the first release we can expect to see will pay homage to Kobe and Gigi with the focus on Gigi Bryant.  

   

   Nike is expected to release the first shoe from this new partnership with the Bryant family. Kobe 6 Protro “Mambacita Sweet 16” which will be releasing on what would have been Gigi Bryant’s 16th birthday May 1,2022. All proceeds from the shoe will benefit the Mamba and Mambacita Sports Foundation. 

   

   So I feel it would only be right in celebration of the new future of Nike/ Bryant partnership in my first let’s kick it, shoe review I will review the Kobe 6 Protro “Mambacita Sweet 16”.

   

   Some of us already took a peak at these shoes back in May when some photos were leaked prior to the Bryant family having a deal in place.  The Kobe 6 Protro “Mambacita Sweet 16” dresses the famous Kobe 6 silhouette in a white and textured black matching the late Gigi Bryant’s Mamba Academy uniform. The Kobe 6 silhouette is also adorned with both father and daughter name on the heel tucked right under the Mamba Academy logo. The  inside is  lined with black and white patterned fabric to give that true Mamba like feel to it. Definitely a must have shoe.  With the understated color way these Kobe 6 will be a hit on and off the court. I can see the sleek, elegant design this shoe can be dressed up from anything from a sports coat to a full tuxedo and still be the element that pops the outfit. The most impressive part was the shoe was completely designed by Vanessa Bryant to pay homage to her late husband and daughter. 

      With release dates appearing to be around the beginning of May we can be sure to find these as a summer staple for 2022 and years to come. So as I prep to devise a plan to obtain a pair of size 12  Kobe 6 Protro a part of me thinks back to that cold December night of 2020 scoping out a way to get the elusive final Grinch Kobe’s I quietly whisper to myself Mamba Forever. 

  

  ###

  Andrew Williams is a Sports Analyst and Host of BallCourt - The World of Basketball with Coach Drew and Let's Kick It - Courtside.

   

   

  Read more

• Gene Therapy - NCAA 2022 |The Final Four: Coaches Are Everything!

  Apr 1, 2022 Gene Clemons 0 Comments

  

   

  by Gene Clemons

   

  The men's and women's final four are both epic this year. On the women's side you have South Carolina trying to ascend to UConn like levels. You have UConn fighting to stave off the oncoming Lady Gamecocks and the other women's teams who keep improving yearly. Stanford is still lurking, ready to prove that they are still one of the elites in the women's game, and of course you have Louisville who keeps knocking on the door to announce themselves as a perennial women's hoop power.

   

  On the men's side you have a couple matchups that may never be topped again. Villanova will face Kansas as the two powerhouse programs duel to see who will get to add another championship to their trophy case. The other matchup is about as epic as you can get in a final four. North Carolina takes on Duke for the first time in the final four. It is a storyline that writes itself. In fact, both are. And it is rare that you get this good of a matchup without their being chalk everywhere but that is the case. Kansas is a one seed, but Duke and Nova are two seeds and UNC is an eight seed.

   

  With all due respect to the Cinderella's and upstarts, these are the matchups that we want to see in the final four. It's not just the top seeds, these are teams that have become a part of what we love about the sport. Causes being pushed and agendas driven which always makes more great storylines. Whenever someone doesn't seem to get there fairly it is news. Stars are being stars and there is always a chance for a new breakout. 

   

  

   

  The coaches are so good!

   

  On the women’s side what can be said about Geno Auriemma that has not already been said in triplicate. The UConn general has established himself as the greatest coach in the history of the women’s game. Not only has he been able to find immense success as a college coach, but he has been a dominant figure in the international game. He’s created a standard at UConn that all other coaches are continuously chasing. But as good as Auriemma is, he is not on top of the all-time wins list, that distinction belongs to Stanford’s Tara VanDerveer who has been a staple in the women’s game for 42 seasons. Her squad is also the reigning national champions. Last year she was able to best manage the bubble and lead her squad to the championship. Jeff Walz is a name that does not get enough publicity in the women’s game, but he has been great for the Cardinal bringing that team to prominence.

   

  Before Walz took over the team only had four NCAA tourney wins. In his 15 seasons, he has 37 wins in the tournament and has advanced to the final four, four times. He has also made it to the championship game twice. He has won a remarkable five straight ACC regular season titles. South Carolina’s Dawn Staley is a legend in the women’s game as a player and is quickly becoming legendary as a coach. In just 14 seasons on the job as a Gamecock she has made four, final four appearances in the last seven years and cut down the nets in 2017. All she knows is gold as a coach of Team USA and she has fiercely fought for women to be appreciated in athletics at the same level as the men. Her recruiting classes keep getting better and better as she produces top 10 WNBA picks almost yearly now.

   

  Bill Self has put together a resume envious of all who have coached the game. Over the last 24 years of his career (18 at KU) He has won over 73% of his games at every stop and that includes an over 82% winning percentage as the Jayhawks leader. He has more accolades that anyone would care to write about, and he is already a member of the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame. He led the Jayhawks to the national title in 2008. Jay Wright is one of the newest members of the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame and in his 21 years as the head coach at Villanova, he has built a monster. His squad has won two national titles. In 2016 when they cut the heart out of Tar Heel fans with a last second buzzer beater and in 2018 when they dashed the hopes of the Michigan faithful. He has found success zigging when others were zagging in recruiting by not targeting potential one and done talent but focusing on the talent that fit the style they wanted to play.

   

  With all due respect to Hubert Davis (and he deserves respect) nobody outside of Chapel Hill will be talking about him in the final four. It is worth noting that not many coaches follow a legend and have immediate success. Not many coaches go to the final four in their first season as a head coach. Most first-time coaches don’t make adjustments that change the trajectory of the team not only in the present but possibly for years to come. What Davis has done at UNC this year is applause worthy. With that being said, all eyes will be fixated on the modern era GOAT of the college coaching world Coach K as he tries to cap off an incredible career with one more national title win. Like many of the other coaches, we could run down all of his accolades but what really matters is five national titles. If he wins it again this season, he will go out with a national championship in four different decades. That level of excellence is mind blowing.

   

  This weekend is filled with storylines. Geno is looking for his 11th championship, and Coach K is zeroing in on six. VanDerveer hopes to win her fourth and Wright is trying to win his third. Self and Staley will hope to double up while Walz and Davis hope that they get to cut down the nets for the first time as coaches. Will UConn have enough to get by Stanford in a pick 'em game? Can anyone stop the freight train that is South Carolina? Can Louisville break through? Can UNC end Coach K’s career? What an epic weekend. Take a seat, grab a drink and your favorite game time snacks, and watch it all unfold.

   

  ###

    

  Gene Clemons is a Sports Analyst and Contributor to CWN Sports. His weekly column and podcast - Gene Therapy focuses on Sports, Politics and Social/Urban issues.

  Read more

• Gene Therapy: Chris Rock, Don't Be Sorry, Be Careful!

  Mar 28, 2022 Gene Clemons 0 Comments

  

   

  by Gene Clemons

   

  Will Smith slapped Chris Rock at the Academy Awards. He did it on live television and in front of an audience filled with their peers. So many people were shocked by the event it almost crashed social media. There is one clip on Twitter that at the time this is being written has over 50 million views. Chris Rock called it "the greatest night in the history of television" in the immediate reaction to the run in with Smith. Why did it happen? It was the product of a joke. A joke that made fun of Jada Pinkett-Smith's bald head. Pinkett-Smith has been open about dealing with alopecia and part of it has been embracing this new bald look. But any time people who live in the public eye have to deal with changes in their life, they do so publicly. Because of that they are open to ridicule and scrutiny by people who feel as if stars should be able to accept ridicule and deal with hurtful jokes because they are rich and famous. You hear people say things like “That’s the price of fame.” This is the place where athletics and the arts deal with the same issues. Because they perform publicly, people believe they know actors, musicians, and athletes. Because they are compensated handsomely, people believe they have the right to say whatever. Jokes like Chris Rock’s open the doors for the average person to make light of a serious situation.

   

  Was the slap extreme, probably, but what better way should Smith have handled it? At some point, embarrassing someone publicly should be matched with the same energy. If Smith reaches out to Rock behind the scenes and voices his displeasure with Rock, would Rock go public with the conversation and apologize or does he go with the old adage that as a comedian, you never feel bad about anything you say on stage because it is all art. If that is the case, there is a chance that as a long-time standup comedian, Rock knew that this could happen when you look to get laughs at the expense of someone in the audience. He may just file the slap under the “price of doing business” as a standup comedian. For Smith, this is simply having his wife’s back in the moment immediately. You could see she did not find the joke funny at all. Will could have sat there but instead wanted to let Rock and probably all of the people who have taken shots at his family for over 25 years that he is no longer going to tolerate the foolishness and disrespect lobbed at them. This is the shot heard round the world and a warning. Tread lightly! But for many others who are not Will Smith or have Smith’s public cache when they are violated or attacked (physically or verbally).

   

  

   

  Athletes are often ridiculed for their performance by people who could never come close to playing their sport and even if they did play, they most likely fall drastically short of the excellence of the player. The entitlement of fans, and even analysts, to believe they can say whatever, whenever they want to an athlete with impunity is amazing. When Kwame Brown became tired of being used as a punchline by Stephen A. Smith and various other NBA and basketball commentators and writers, he began firing back. Some of the rants he went on were probably funny to many in the public space, but they came from a real place where that man no longer felt as if he could hold his tongue. We have all been there but thankfully for the majority of us, we don’t have to live out our lives for millions of people to see.

   

  So, on the occasion that there is a response from an athlete, it is often disastrous for the fan and the player. The fan gets beat up, embarrassed, removed from venues, and banned from watching the team they claim to love in person. With all of that, it is still worse for the players. They receive backlash for being thin skinned. They get their actions questioned and their performances are put underneath a microscope, and if they actually get into a physical altercation, there is the legal side of things, especially if that person is looking at the player as a lottery ticket. Even when the fan is in the wrong, they still look for cause to sue a player and force a settlement because most players don’t want their personal lives on display for everyone to see. Many people look to take advantage of the fact that for many of these athletes, it is cheaper to settle than to spend the time and money going through civil litigation. In many cases athletes, like movie and music stars, can’t live normal lives. There is so much anxiety behind functioning in a society that forces them to be “on” at all times because Lebron has to be Lebron at the store, Beyonce has to always be Beyonce regardless of how she feels, and Will Smith is expected to be the “Fresh Prince” or that movie megastar they see on screen.

   

  This Smith/Rock situation should remind everyone of a simple fact. Just because you have freedom of speech, it does not mean you are free from the consequences that follow your speech. In this hyper-sensitive society, it is interesting that criticism and ridicule have not subsided. In fact, many fans, columnists, bloggers, and mass media types feel more empowered to voice their strong opinions because they realize that level of spice gets reactions from people on both sides of the issue. We hardly ever stop to consider the feelings of the person we are kicking while they are down. We don’t think in their worst moment or a time where they are feeling unsure of themselves that their reaction might be over the top. That’s a failure on our part to read the room because whatever was said could possibly be the straw that broke the camel’s back. This event is supposed to be a celebration of excellence in film, it is not a stand-up half-hour special. For the most part, the people attending this show are not there for the laughs and they definitely are not there for laughs at the expense of the people who are there or dealing with illness.

   

  It has been said that Rock may not have known what Pinkett-Smith was going through. If that is the case, then that is a failure on his part. The first failure was to make people laugh by dissing someone else. The second failure was not knowing the person you were dissing, was going through a serious issue and that it had probably affected her mentally and emotionally. The final failure was not being prepared. He stood on stage with his hands behind his back after firing off his joke and the subsequent comments based on the crowd reaction. He watched Smith walk up to him knowing that was not in the program or script. He then took a flush slap to the face which we should all be thankful that Smith did not decide to test out his punching ability. Rock may have been out cold; Smith would have been escorted out in handcuffs and society would still be mocking people. In fact, the entire aftermath has been filled with people getting their jokes off at Rock’s expense; what interesting irony.

   

  ###

    

  Gene Clemons is a Sports Analyst and Contributor to CWN Sports. His weekly column and podcast - Gene Therapy focuses on Sports, Politics and Social/Urban issues.

  Read more